Friday, July 21, 2006

The Miracle of Life

For the past few days, there have been one natural disaster after the other marred by some human manufactured conflagrations. There was the tsunami in Indonesia (again) interspersed with the bombings in Mumbai followed by the sudden drying up of the Amazon basin with the West Asian flare up.

I was reading a book called “A Short History of Nearly Everything” by Bill Bryson. Amongst many other things, it traces the birth of life, the now incredible to imaging volcanic eruptions, the meteorite crashes that would make nuclear weapons look like kid’s toys and the deep freeze of the Ice Age. To top it all, the BBC was having a program about the massive glass deposits in Sahara which could have been caused by “Air bursts” – a meteorite exploding as a ball of fire just before it crashed into earth which not just created heat, but, melted the sand to form among other things, glass and diamond!

All of this got me thinking – life is so fragile. A simple earth-quake and millions are devastated. A tsunami hits the land and a country is brought down to its knees. The homo sapiens, a thinking man has is left absolutely powerless in this sudden display of raw power from the nature.

Why is it that we who could build such complex things as super computers, electron microscopes, airplanes and rockets be left so helpless against the nature’s fury? Explaining the complexity in measuring or monitoring the earth’s activities, Bryson has made a comment that is quite intriguing. Before saying that here’s the context:
• To predict earth quakes, we need to understand the working of the earth’s interior. Currently, all our knowledge of earth’s core is more of a conjecture. We have barely scratched the surface. Ditto with volcanoes.
• To say anything about draught and rain, we need to predict weather accurately. Our most computers have a problem in telling this simple thing: If you blow smoke in a room, how will it travel? If this can’t be predicted, then how can we predict the movement of water vapor and clouds in a very open environment with the earth spinning at thousands of kilometers on its axis and running ahead along its orbit?
• Even the latest satellites and telescopes can only see at barely the outer reaches of most galaxies and stars. We have barely understood our solar system. We simply don’t know how many comets and meteors are there. They could be simply like any pedestrian who suddenly comes on the path of earth’s orbit on a very dark night. Before we even know it, BANG!

Complaining about all this, Bryson says:
..we live in a universe whose age we can’t quite compute, surrounded by stars whose distance from us and each other we don’t altogether know, filled with matter we can’t identify, operating in conformance with physical laws whose properties we don’t truly understand.


And yet, we survive and evolve and look and the sky and say, “How did it all begin?”

Isn’t it marvelous and truly incredible that in such a hostile environment we could all come to life and enjoy the bounties of life. Yet, instead of enjoying it, we are so involved in drawing lines on ground that can’t be seen just a few meters from the ground - we shed so much blood and cause strife. What if tomorrow a meteorite would hurl down and hit the war torn region of West Asia? The land there will simply vanish and so will the life. What will the freedom fighters fight over (assuming some are still alive)? A cindered earth which is poisonous and can neither be used for growing food nor for living?

Don’t you sometimes feel that we quibble over things that should not even be considered important? Somehow, we build grand museums and teach history and yet, we never seem to learn anything from it.. The same old quarrels, the same old greed and lust for power and finally, the same old winners oppressing the losers. Sure, the nature follows the rule of Survival of the Fittest. And yet, after all the blood-letting, if you discover there is nothing much to celebrate and nobody to even share the happiness with, is the whole struggle worth fighting?

{I know the thoughts are very jumbled – but, I just jotted down whatever kept coming into the mind..}

Thursday, July 06, 2006

Bend it like Beckham and mend it like Football!

This was an article that had appeared in Times of India on 8th July, 2006. Amazing philosophy! Hope you'll like it..

Spirituality seldom dribbled with soccer, until the ‘Hand of God’ came into play during the quarter-final match of the 1986 World Cup football between Argentina and England. Diego Maradona claimed that divine intervention had helped him score the controversial goal.

A short film made in 2003 by Mike Walker — Does God Play Football? — explored the relationship between God and Tommy, a seven-year-old football fan. Tommy’s only desire is to have a father of his own to play football with. In the absence of a real Dad, he adopts God as his father with the help of a local priest — very like how the human soul longs for communion with the Universal spirit.

An individual remains unfit for spiritual journey without the requisite physical and mental strength. Vivekananda said: “You will be nearer to Heaven through football than through the study of the Bhagavad Gita”. A player’s patience and perseverance is tested on the football field at every moment; the ability to wriggle out of tough situations and hold on to one’s nerves in tight situations. A seeker, too, has to undergo such trials during the inward game of realisation.

Look at football as a metaphor for life. The ball is the individual’s ego. Team members are family and friends; trust in teammates is the foundation of a good relationship and helps the player win the match of happiness. The opposition players are obstacles like anger, pride, hatred, that must be overcome to reach the goalpost. The goalpost is the universal consciousness to which a person must ultimately submit the ego, to achieve true bliss. The coach is the guru who teaches the way and the player learns from his mistakes on the field. The referee is the law of karma that reinforces the correct rules for playing. The audience is society that reacts to performance on the field. As in life, a game that has started must end. As long as the person is in the game, one gets the illusion of limited time and space. Only when the game gets over, does one realise the limitlessness of time and space.

Every player is assigned a particular role on the field according to his skills — forward, midfielder, defender, or goalkeeper. Similarly, in life we have designated roles. Our capabilities and choices determine the contribution we make to the world through our work. Like a player who can manoeuvre the ball on the field, a person has the free will to choose his thoughts, words and actions. Football is meditation ‘on the run’. A player is always ‘in the moment’ for the entire duration of play. The player has no thought of past and no use for future, as all the scoring opportunities are created in the ‘now’.

Football teaches one to be a good spectator, one who watches the game with passionate detachment. For him, an exciting football match is only that — a game. Wins or losses, even for his favourite team, do not bother him. A good spectator is like a joyful observer of life; he witnesses events around him as they come and go, and remains detached as he is always centred in truth.

Today, football is a faith binding a legion of followers across the world. People, irrespective of their religions, nationalities and cultures, are tuning in simultaneously to watch live football. If this is not universal brotherhood, what else is?